Hill, Tomei and Reilly gamely participate in a study of dubious relationships in the Duplass's "Cyrus.
I've an elusive thought: Am I the only one to notice that John C. Reilly's relationship with his ex-wife in Jay and Mark Duplass's "Cyrus" is every bit as unhealthy as Jonah Hill's with his mother? That parallel seems to be the point of an otherwise pointless, albeit engaging, film but it's been addressed by no critics to the best of my knowledge. It's also interesting that Reilly's so-called hero consistently, and rather selfishly, intrudes upon and interrupts two relationships here - Catherine Keener's with her fiancé and Marisa Tomei's with her son. He's an interloper and a third wheel in both cases - a narcissist deceptively disguised in sheep's clothing.
6 comments:
Brian
said...
Joe, what you wrote struck home. I had the same observation/question.
You’re right. There is a huge parallel at work in this film that has gone unexamined by movie writers. Without it, "Cyrus" would be a merely amusing film. The parallel, however, lends its a little bit of substance.
I think one reason the film has received only a lukewarm reception from critics is that they failed to pick up on the parallel you mention. It's the only point of interest in the movie.
For me, "Cyrus" goes from impossible to dislike to impossible to like, largely because of Reilly's character (and maybe his performance). He's a really dark character but Duplasses themselves seem oblivious to this. I think the film has to be a lot darker to work and the ending has to be downbeat.
i'm afraid to say it because I admire you're insight: nobody else has mentioned it because there is no substance to that view. 1st: his relationship beyond breakup only extended to its current state as the result of a mutual bond: keeners and o'reilly, while only a real and heartfelt identity with tomei's character is the only thing that keeps o'reilly's man onboard, a sentiment which would have been non-existent with a truly narcissistic man, devoid of empathy or real love. I see Keener's character as the interloper, unable to really lift her anchor due to a real connection she maintains with our protagonist while unable to reach out and pull him from the social precipice he hangs upon, and obviously overjoyed to see Tomei's character reach forward and rescue him from.
i'm afraid to say it because I admire your insight: nobody else has mentioned it because there is no substance to that view. 1st: his relationship beyond breakup only extended to its current state as the result of a mutual bond: keeners and o'reilly, while only a real and heartfelt identity with tomei's character is the only thing that keeps o'reilly's man onboard, a sentiment which would have been non-existent with a truly narcissistic man, devoid of empathy or real love. I see Keener's character as the interloper, unable to really lift her anchor due to a real connection she maintains with our protagonist while unable to reach out and pull him from the social precipice he hangs upon, and obviously overjoyed to see Tomei's character reach forward and rescue him from.
a fan's notes by joe baltake devoted to movies neglected and mostly misunderstood
hits per page view ~ 2,000,000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
about this site, a collection of movie-fed daydreams...
Life is simply one grand excuse to watch movies and then sit around and think about them. While my education was honed by reviewing films for Gannett, Tribune, McClatchy, The News Corporation and Knight-Ridder, my personality - or rather my taste - was shaped largely in my old neighborhood movie theater and on my parents' living room floor. Watching movies. And falling in love with the unacclaimed. Passionately. (the passionate moviegoer ® is a registered trademark)
"There is no better evidence of Joe's passion than his subject matter, defending and remembering the more obscure titles from cinematic history. No matter how much you think you might know about movies, odds are you will learn of new ones if you check out Joe's site."
"Joe ... devotes himself to those myriad neglected figures and movies seemingly left by the roadside in our societal rush toward cultural amnesia. Whether he is trying to find the source of Jack Lemmon's quicksilver appeal or understand Vincente Minnelli's valedictory films or express just why we miss Jack Carson, Joe is consistently thoughtful and knowledgeable without being ponderous."
~ joe baltake accommodation: first place for commentary / Society of Professional Journalists / 1995
“For his strength as a storyteller, pulling powerful imagery with smooth transitions into a tapestry of opinion, observation and dialogue, his voice resonating throughout his reviews."
6 comments:
Joe, what you wrote struck home. I had the same observation/question.
You’re right. There is a huge parallel at work in this film that has gone unexamined by movie writers. Without it, "Cyrus" would be a merely amusing film. The parallel, however, lends its a little bit of substance.
I think one reason the film has received only a lukewarm reception from critics is that they failed to pick up on the parallel you mention. It's the only point of interest in the movie.
For me, "Cyrus" goes from impossible to dislike to impossible to like, largely because of Reilly's character (and maybe his performance). He's a really dark character but Duplasses themselves seem oblivious to this. I think the film has to be a lot darker to work and the ending has to be downbeat.
i'm afraid to say it because I admire you're insight: nobody else has mentioned it because there is no substance to that view. 1st: his relationship beyond breakup only extended to its current state as the result of a mutual bond: keeners and o'reilly, while only a real and heartfelt identity with tomei's character is the only thing that keeps o'reilly's man onboard, a sentiment which would have been non-existent with a truly narcissistic man, devoid of empathy or real love. I see Keener's character as the interloper, unable to really lift her anchor due to a real connection she maintains with our protagonist while unable to reach out and pull him from the social precipice he hangs upon, and obviously overjoyed to see Tomei's character reach forward and rescue him from.
i'm afraid to say it because I admire your insight: nobody else has mentioned it because there is no substance to that view. 1st: his relationship beyond breakup only extended to its current state as the result of a mutual bond: keeners and o'reilly, while only a real and heartfelt identity with tomei's character is the only thing that keeps o'reilly's man onboard, a sentiment which would have been non-existent with a truly narcissistic man, devoid of empathy or real love. I see Keener's character as the interloper, unable to really lift her anchor due to a real connection she maintains with our protagonist while unable to reach out and pull him from the social precipice he hangs upon, and obviously overjoyed to see Tomei's character reach forward and rescue him from.
Post a Comment