To watch Sam Rockwell, as Fosse, carry on about the awfulness of the film is to witness an act of self-laceration. Perhaps that's the point, given Fosse's emotional issues. But it's never mentioned that the original stage production of "Sweet Charity" was hardly a classic. It was one of the last of the "tired businessman" musicals, shows top-heavy with leggy chorus girls to placate those husbands forced into the theater by their wives.
What was cheesy on stage became even more so under the relentless scrutiny of the camera's eye - and it didn't help that the film was made during the flower power/summer of love era, something which Fosse exploited to the hilt, instantly dating his psychedelic movie.
Fifty years later (50 years? Yikes!), the movie version is cheesier than ever and is one of those films that gets worse with each viewing, so much so that I finally gave in and gave up my DVD of it. But not before watching it one more time to try to figure out exactly what went so wrong.
More than five decades later, one is aware of all the unfortunate decisions that Fosse made. One dubious decision after another. Like the psychedelia. Then there are the arty, sepia-toned still shots that occasionally dot the 149-minute film and that are utterly pointless and way too pretentious.
There's the "Rich Man's Frug" number - a triptych of gratuitous dances set in a glitzy disco, circa '69, and overburdened with Fosse's annoying choreographic mannerisms. Along with the cringe-worthy Sammy Davis, Jr. bit, "The Rhythm of Life," this number also dates the film. Badly.
The casting of Shirley MacLaine in the title role seemed perfect - on paper - and, while she has a few terrific moments in the film, the pervasive self-pity in her performance makes it unpleasant to watch. In retrospect, her reading of the lovelorn heroine, Charity Hope Valentine, is a little too much of a rehash of Ginny Moorehead, the equally lovelorn (more pathetic) character she weepily played ten years earlier in Vincente Minnelli's "Some Came Running..." (1958). Lots of narcissistic tears here. Too many.
Then there's the transparent ploy of Peter Stone's screenplay to tone down Charity's "floozie" qualities whenever the character has a scene with Oscar (John MacMartin), the nice guy who could rescue her from her nowhere life. Suddenly, Charity is sedate. (Sorry, Peter, that's cheating.)
Finally, there's that big production number, "I'm a Brass Band," composed by Cy Coleman and Dorothy Field, that is not only jaw-droppingly bad but makes no sense whatsoever. Huh? Why would anyone, much less Charity Hope Valentine, equate being in love with marching with a brass band?
The number, staged in the courtyard of Lincoln Center, no less, stops the film cold - and it never recovers. With dozens of chorus boys crowding the screen, it goes on and on and on, with old pro Shirl huffing and puffing, screeching the lyrics and straining her ligaments to little avail.
No, not everything that Bob Fosse created was great.
Exacerbating matters is the sense that MacLaine is not exactly light on her feet. She galumphs actually. It's been noted that she does much less dancing in the film than Gwen Verdon did in the stage version, and that might have something to do with her limitations as a dancer.
Notes in Passing: Universal released "Sweet Charity" as a big roadshow production which failed to engage both the media (it received scant coverage) and audiences (poor box-office returns). After its lackluster reserved-seat engagements, the studio punished the film, so to speak, by chopping out 30 minutes for its general release. (Paramount did the same thing in 1967 to George Sidney's 143-minute "Half a Sixpence" after it unde-rperformed as a roadshow.) Gone, among other elements, were those sepia still shots and the second of those three deadly disco numbers. The Davis number, unfortunately, remained intact. Too bad that Universal didn't attempt to airbrush out most of Shirley MacLaine's tears.
On its way to the screen, "Charity" lost several songs, including at least one good one - "Baby, Dream Your Dream" - and gained a few new ones, most notably the terrific opener, "My Personal Property," which sounds like something Bobby Short would have sung at his piano at the Cafe Carlyle. Coleman also wrote a new - and improved - melody for the title song.
The DVD/Blu Ray of "Sweet Charity" contains an alternate - happy - ending in which Charity and Oscar reunite. The theatrical release of the film ends sadly but, as a title card promises, also "hopefully."
Bob Fosse was a movie-musical staple during thr 1950s - dancing (and acting) on screen ("Kiss Me, Kate," which TCM is airing at 4 p.m., est., on Saturday, April 13); choreographing films ("The Pajama Game" and "Damn Yankees"), and dancing and acting and choreographing all at the same time ("My Sister Eileen"). He directed only a handful of films and, oddly, for me at least, his best movie isn't a musical at all. It's "Lenny" (1974).
No dancing here.
Regarding Comments:
All comments are enthusiastically appreciated but are moderated before
publication. Replies signed "unknown" or "anonymous" are not
encouraged. Please sign any response with a name (real or fabricated) or
initials. Be advised that a "name" will be assigned to any accepted
post signed "unknown" or "anonymous." Thank you.
~image~
~Shirley MacLaine performing "I'm a Brass Band" in "Sweet Charity"
~photography: Universal Pictures 1969©
~photography: Universal Pictures 1969©
21 comments:
This is one musical that was always short on style and sophistication. I think it stinks. I guess the stink was less when it was pared down.
Agreed. But Fosse at least knew how to photograph dance movements - in full frame and not sliced-and-diced - unlike contemporary musical directors such as Marshall and Condon.
Maybe Fosse was aiming for surrealism with "Sweet Charity." I can't think of any other way to explain its oddness.
To answer your question, yes, it was always cheesy.
I never liked that number either. It's pretty inane. But I always liked the movie itself and I like Shirley. It was a film that I saw as a kid and still enjoy it.
I also admire Shirley MacLaine and I know she's supposed to be a trained dancer. But you'd never know it from this movie. Most of the time she just struts through numbers and shakes her butt. I don't know if Fosse had to adapt his choreography to accommodate her limitations but her dancing in the film is kinda weak.
Jodie- Yeah, her dancing in "Charity" leaves a lot to be desired. "If My Friends Could See Me Now" is a particular disappointment. But she works hard in "There's Gotta Be Something Better Than This," keeping up with Chita Rivera and Paula Kelly. Her dancing in "Can-Can" is also rather heavy-footed. Perhaps her most pleasing work as a dancer on film is in a fantasy bit opposite Gene Kelly in "What a Way to Go!" -J
Joe, I loved Fosse's bit as the snake in Stanley Donen's "The Little Prince." It's the highlight of the movie!
Joe, your assessment of Sweet Charity hit the bullseye. It was so excruciating that I never would have guessed Fosse would get another chance behind the camera, let alone win an Oscar. (In fact, he is the only person ever to win the Oscar, Tony and Emmy in the same year). When I saw the ad for the movie Cabaret in the New York Times a few years later I wrote it off as another potential loser (Allied Artists? Liza Minnelli?). As for Shirley MacLaine, she has stated that she identifies more as a dancer than an actress, but her graceless clunkiness has always been obvious to me. Sidenote: My parents took me to see Sweet Charity on Broadway because my mother was a huge Gwen Verdon fan. Verdon was a no-show that night and we saw Helen Gallagher in her place. The show was only so-so, and Gwen Verdon’s star dimmed considerably in my mother’s eyes.
Kevin- Believe it or not, in terms of Fosse films, I prefer "Sweet Charity" to "Cabaret," which I found unwatchable the first time I saw it for reviewing purposes - and then hugely overrated as the glowing reviews started to come in. Neither film is very good (but clearly for different reasons); both have unnecessary flaws that (again, for me) stem strictly from Fosse's rather minimal bag of tricks. -J
Y'know what's really crazy? "Sweet Charity," a film about hookers, excuse me, dance hall hostesses, and all that implies, was rated "G!" General audiences. Really?
Gary, yes, the G rating. Absolutely ridiculous. The only way that I could rationalize that rating was because a big studio was behind the film. Otherwise, it made no sense. It was a joke. -J
This is my first blog comment after reading you for years. Why now? Well, you have written what I similarly think but have an inability to write clearly. Often, I read your thoughts and say to myself "Exactly!" - which is what happened a few minutes ago when reading "the. worst. production. number. ever."
Thanks, Tess!
I believe MacLaine also danced a bit in Martin & Lewis' "Artists & Models."
Yes. And she also did a few dance warm-ups and exercises as Gittle in "Two for the Seasaw."
If not MacLaine as Charity, then who? I can't think of anyone at that point in time who was right for the role.
Good question. But the first name that comes to mind is Goldie Hawn who, back in 1969, was brand new and the right age for the role. Plus, she could sing and dance. -J
I like the "Rich Man's Frug" production number--but, yes, the film version of "Sweet Charity" is close to unwatchable! All the elements were there to make a decent picture, but it just didn't "gel," somehow. (But I agree with David P.--bad as "Sweet Charity" is, it's still a better-directed film than the Marshall/Condon musicals!)
Regarding SWEET CHARITY’s G rating, I believe 1968 was the first year (or at least the second) where the new rating system was instituted, the MPAA was feeling their way through the new guidelines, and what films should be rated and why.
How else to explain Hammer’s DRACULA HAS RISEN FROM THE GRAVE (1968) being released with a G rating, TRUE GRIT (1969) having a G rating despite a close up of two fingers being chopped off, and MIDNIGHT COWBOY (1969) getting an X rating.
I bet if SWEET CHARITY had been released a year or two later, it would not have been rated G. More likely GP (as the PG rating was known by initially).
Kevin- I believe that you are absolutely spot-on about this. However, remember that the major studios were not enthused about the ratings system and, given that this was a Universal release (and a musical), it's easy to assume that the ratings broad was giving the film a pass. -J
Post a Comment