Wednesday, April 20, 2016

... and, now, about kelly...

Michael Strahan may be ABC's superhero, but the personality who’s really indispensable in the very strange world of Daytime Television is the peerless Kelly.  Yes, Kelly Ripa

Let's talk TV today - daytime TV, to be specific.

Now, before you ask what daytime TV has to do with movies, I hasten to note that there are no longer any barriers that separate the various arts from each other or from the assorted media (including, and especially, social media).  And on daytime TV, it's all one giant mash-up of bold-faced names, film clips, tie-ins, name-dropping and shameless self-promotion.

It's also - except for a quartet of exceptions - dated, repetitious and as depressing as hell.  You have ABC's solitary soap, "General Hospital," which has been an unwatchable mess for about a decade now; the network's "The View," which should be put out of its misery (and misery is indeed the operative word here) and CBS's antiquated game shows "The Price Is Right" and "Let's Make a Deal" where, with scant encouragement, the contestants are more than happy to behave like hapless buffoons.

And so, it came as no surprise that the The 43rd Annual Daytime Emmy Awards (scheduled for May 1st ) would not be televised this year.  I mean, really, how often can one watch the same game shows, the same talk shows and the same soaps win awards that interest no one?

BTW, there are currently only four soap operas remaining on daytime TV and guess how many of them have been nominated this year.

That's right - all four, only one of which is notable.

That would be CBS's "The Young and the Restless," one of the aforementioned four exceptions that make daytime TV bearable and a top TV drama in general (although it is currently being overseen by refugees from the unfortunate "General Hospital," a reason for pause).

The other three are CBS's "The Talk" (despite the fact its five co-hosts, all incredibly personable, have taken it on themselves to do non-stop damage control for spoiled celebrities who pay people to do exactly that for them); Rachel Ray's fabulous food-and-talk show on ABC, and, in a class all by itself, "Live with Kelly and Michael," also on ABC. ("Rachel" and "Live" are both Disney-syndicated but air on ABC channels exclusively.)

The Kelly and Michael of the title are, of course, the peerless Kelly Ripa and the ever-surprising Michael Strahan, a former NFL star who has evolved into an unexpectedly pleasing TV personality - so much so that ABC has elected to remove Strahan from "Live" and situate him on its more valuable morning show, "Good Morning, America," which is arguably the definitive mash-up of all those ingredients listed in the second paragraph here (plus some sociopolitical news for legitimacy).

Strahan has been a twice-a-week contributor on GMA, starting there approximately the same time he joined "Live," where he replaced Regis Philbin.  The pairing of Kelly and Michael, which seemed wildly off-beat on paper, turned out to beterrific -  a match of perfection.

According to Wikipedia, after Strahan teamed with Ripa, "ratings instantly surged, impressively generating year-over-year time slot gains across all key demographics, towering over its nearest competition, the fourth hour of NBC's 'Today Show,' by 87 percent."  As it is with Wikipedia, I'm not exactly sure who wrote this impressive info/blurb, possibly a Strahan assistant. Anyway, ABC apparently took note and, shortly after his debut on "Live," Strahan joined GMA for occasional weekly appearances.

Since then, Strahan has been seemingly everywhere and dabbling in seemingly everything. He has an eponymous men's clothing line and a motivational book, "Wake Up Happy: The Dream Big, Win Big Guide to Transforming Your Life"; he's been the spokesperson for the P&G Meta products; and his other TV work includes his role as a FOX NFL Sunday analyst and the host of the upcoming ABC (yes, ABC) game-show reboot, "The $100,000 Pyramid," airing this summer. Have I missed anything?

Whew!

So his ascension to a top spot on GMA is just the latest stride for Michael Strahan and, while no one would begrudge his apparently unquenchable ambition, the circumstances surrounding this latest move seem dubious at best.  It's great that Strahan is going to GMA and terrible that he's leaving "Live."  What's disturbing in the secrecy about the move - so secret that reportedly (if one is to believe reports) not even Ripa or (reportedly) "Live" producer Michael Gelman knew about it until it was announced by an ABC honcho, James Goldston, president of its news division.

And one would think that Ripa and Gelman, of all people, deserved the courtesy of a heads-up at the very least. Strahan's stock has risen largely because of "Live" in general and his chemistry with Ripa in particular.

Strahan has been admired for his accessible "everyguy" demeanor and I guess ABC is counting on that quality to help GMA as it struggles to surmount its rival, NBC's "Today Show," which has snapped up the "people between 25 and 54" demographic so valued by advertisers.

But the questionable way this has been handled, the perceived deception, is not something that viewers associate with Strahan's "brand."  (Full disclosure: Having worked for newspapers for an unhealthy number of years, I'm accustomed to overpaid people making bad decisions.)

This could be potentially damaging.

As for Kelly Ripa, I have every confidence that she will do just fine.  She has that rare ability to pair up perfectly with just about everyone, not just Michael Strahan, as evidence by the revolving-door of guys who auditioned for the seat that Strahan successfully won four years ago and who have replaced him during his days off.  Plus, unlike many of her co-hosts (Strahan included), Ripa is quick on her feet and a natural comic.  And she's immensely likable. I guess what I'm saying is, she's perfect.

Or at least, the perfect TV host.  And on morning TV, she's like a tonic.

She's also a pro, a top professional.  But even a pro can be pushed too far.  And so it came as no surprise that, the day after Goldston's big Strahan announcment, Kelly was absent from today's "Live" telecast. Ana Gasteyer filled in. She was competent.  But she's no Kelly Ripa.

Michael Strahan will be easy to replace - I have no doubt about that - but "Live" is unthinkable without Kelly. And so, the next time ABC and Goldston are looking to clandestinely snare someone away from an ABC syndicated show, I suggest that they aim higher (read: Kelly Ripa).

26 comments:

  1. Sheila12:34 PM

    Yes! Joe, I always thought Ripa was a natural - naturally funny. I mean, she's funny without straining and without offending. And, yes, she seems to have chemistry with everyone. Thanks for this long-overdue tribute to her.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sheila: In the days of old Hollywood when the moguls ruled, they would have loved Ripa and groomed her for stardom in comedies. But, frankly, I think she found her element on "Live." -J

    ReplyDelete
  3. What has me confused is why Strahan can't do both shows. He seems to have no trouble juggling multiple careers. He's been pretty ubiquitous in the past few years.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Charlotte1:33 PM

    This whole matter seems to have been handled shabbily, needlessly so. Why not be upfront about it? We're talking about a spot on some TV show, not really high security stuff. This reflects badly on the key people involved.

    ReplyDelete
  5. richard l.1:58 PM

    I find the secrecy of it hilarious. The self-importance at play here is a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tracy2:15 PM

    Strahan's glib response to the news today was a huge turnoff. I liked him but I won't miss him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bad form all around.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous3:48 PM

    granted, the chemistry between Ripa and Strahan has been good,I personally just watch for them to spin the wheel to see if I can outwit the actual contestants....yeah, I know, that's shallow, but on a more serious note, the way it has been handled is more of a negative reflection of the ' suits' at ABC. Look forward to seeing the pair every weekday morning till they split up. I feel that it's a slap in the face to Kelly Ripa and Michael Gelman on how the announcement has been handled.....

    ReplyDelete
  9. yeah, I agree....Ripa is pretty comedic in her own right.....and why ABC is splitting up this successful duo makes me wonder about the ' suits ' and their decisions....


    ReplyDelete
  10. Vince Kowalski4:57 PM

    Bad form? I call it disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. She's P.O.'d that he didn't tell her before the announcement. He was also a great football player for my N.Y. Giants.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dick! If she's P.O.d, as you put it, she should be. All this could have been handled in a much more professional way. -J

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sharon5:15 PM

    Don't watch daytime TV. Scarcely recognize Michael Strahan but he has a wonderfully friendly face that attracts attention. Kelly Ripa is a regular in fan magazines I read at the beauty shop. She has been featured as well in "women's" magazines, discussing her marriage, children, and many personal tips. Very appealing, refreshing woman! My guess is the secretive process of making the change reflects the intense rivalry of TV programming and perhaps a foolish attempt to promote Michael and not give Kelly herself a chance to comment. It is not good business practice, but certainly not unusual thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Joe, I haven't lived in the US for over 25 years and while I've seen Kelly's name pop up on MSN (whom I confuse with a Megan Kelly) I had never heard of Michael until this week when a pop up came up with "possible replacements" for him. I am sure they are lovely people but I don't think I will ever see them.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anyone who watches the show should have seen this coming. This was apparent when Michael was snagged by GMA shortly after joining Kelly on "Live." A precedent had been set. And not a good one apparently.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Tim K.6:40 PM

    I doubt that this news will encourage more viewers to watch "Good Morning, America." I'll stick to "The Today Show"

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm afraid that Strahan has definitely damaged his brand. People will now see him in a different way.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Doris9:36 PM

    I'm sure the "suits" made the decision to be sneaky about the whole affair but it's Strahan who will take the heat.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tim K.2:19 PM

    You overlooked Strahan's curious bit in "Magic Mike XXL"!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Brian Lucas6:04 PM

    I for one never expected Strahan to be in for the long haul. He always came across as too much of a player - and I don't mean on the football field. The fact that he was successfully wooed by GMA so soon after he joined "Live" was an indication that he had bigger fish to fry. Good for him. Not so good for "Live."

    ReplyDelete
  21. It will be fascinating to see what happens now. Seems to me that the show has been tainted. It won't be the same.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Jaunita Ross6:22 PM

    Michael is also the host of a kids' awards show, on Nichelodeon, I think.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think everyone here could have behaved better. The suits could have been less secretive about their plans, Michael could have not agreed to go along with the deceptive secrecy and Kelly could have taken a deep breath and realized that she could not change things and simply wish Michael her best. All of this became unnecessarily ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Kelly has a right to be angry but I believe her anger goes deeper than Michael's leaving the show. I sense that this may be the last straw in a history of not being treated properly and with respect and professionalism. This seems to be a long time coming.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Veronica6:47 AM

    Well, it took the death of Prince to knock Kelly and Michael off the headlines!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ellen6:52 PM

    There's no such thing as bad publicity

    ReplyDelete