tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18439960.post4684968917808093067..comments2024-03-23T21:46:50.843-04:00Comments on the passionate moviegoer: cinema obscura: Amy Heckerling's "Loser" (2000)joe baltakehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11467420961490314339noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18439960.post-72988844175631840362012-03-16T09:08:21.106-04:002012-03-16T09:08:21.106-04:00Wow! You're right!Wow! You're right!Stephanienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18439960.post-71629016763959231712012-03-16T07:42:16.006-04:002012-03-16T07:42:16.006-04:00As a wise man once said: In literature, it's p...As a wise man once said: In literature, it's plagiarism; in cinema, it's homage.Rogernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18439960.post-71334620821622369132012-03-12T12:03:17.796-04:002012-03-12T12:03:17.796-04:00I enjoyed "Loser" when it was releases a...I enjoyed "Loser" when it was releases and didn't understand the largely negative reviews. For me, its only major shortcoming was that Heckerling didn't seem to have a feel for New York as a setting in the way that she does for Los Angeles, in both "Clueless" and "Fast Times at Ridgmont High." Good choice for this feature.wwolfenoreply@blogger.com